Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala’s ruling CPI(M) on Tuesday said imposing a ban on an extremist organisation or a communal force would not put an end to its activities and if such a step has to be taken then RSS should be the first one to be banned.
CPI(M) state secretary M V Govindan’s statement came amidst reports that the Centre was planning to include the Popular Front of India (PFI) in the list of terror outfits.
His statement also comes a day after BJP chief J P Nadda alleged that Kerala was now a “hotspot” of terrorism and fringe elements and life was not safe in the southern state.
Reacting the arrest of innocent PFI rank and file on flimsy and premeditated conspired charges, founder President of the Rashtriya Jana Parishad (RJP) MA Mujeeb lambasted RSS for its conspiracy to silence all those fighting for democracy by misusing the State agencies for the survival of the BJP.
In fact there should be proportional competition between all political parties functioning in democracy Mujeeb added Nadda and principal remote controller RSS were traitors in pre-independence and the factually BJP’s rank and file doing the RSS work in post independence by diving the nation like her enemies and became traitors of the nation.
Mujeeb demanded banning of RSS and BJP, AIMIM and all those who use religion and to mislead the commoners, for their only survival on the religious sidelines
“If an organisation has to be banned, then it has to be RSS. It is the main organisation carrying out communal activities. Will it be banned? Banning an extremist organisation will not address the problem. RSS has been banned in the past. The CPI has been banned.
“Banning an organisation will not end it or its ideology. They would only come back with a new name or identity. We need to create awareness against such groups and take legal action against them when they commit any illegality,” he told reporters.
The CPI state secretary was referring to the ban on CPI in 1950 and the bans on RSS in pre and post-independence India.
Govindan further said that RSS, BJP and the Sangh Parivar are presently seeking the ban on PFI.
“So if communal forces are to be banned, RSS will have to be the first one. But that is not going to happen in the present political scenario in the country,” he added.
The CPI(M) state secretary further said that when two communal forces confront each other, they make each other stronger and “that is what is going on now” be it RSS or a minority communal group.
He also answered in the negative when asked whether the Left front joined hands with such organisations to win elections in local body polls.
PFI, whose hundreds of leaders were recently arrested and its offices raided across the country, had called a hartal in Kerala on September 23 during which its activists had allegedly engaged in widespread violence resulting in damage to buses, public property and even attacks on the general public.
Regarding what happened on September 23, Govindan said that while the government and the Left party were not against hartals, as everyone has the right to protest, it was not in favour of violence and destruction of property in the name of agitations.
“The Chief Minister has said strict action would be taken against those who engaged in violence during the hartal. Damaging buses, attacking passengers and destruction of public property is what happened in the name of hartal.
“Strict action will be taken against those involved,” he said.
On Monday too, Govindan had said banning extremist organisations will not end their activities.
He had alleged that both majority and minority communal outfits were targeting the ruling Left in the state.
Govindan’s statement had come amid growing demand for enforcing a ban on PFI following last week’s raids and arrest of the outfit leaders by multi-agency teams, spearheaded by NIA, at 93 locations in 15 states for allegedly supporting terror activities in the country.
Kerala, where the PFI has some strong pockets, accounted for the maximum number of 22 arrests.
The arrests were made by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and police forces of the states concerned.